He put on a legal clinic during the OJ Simpson murder trial in '95. A mountain of evidence was stacked against Simpson, but the defense obscured the facts, played with words, and out-lawyered the DA's office. Simpson was a jealous ex-husband who had beat his wife before. His blood was found at the crime scene. The only other blood there was from the two knifed murder victims. The blood of both victims was also found in OJ's car and home, along with OJ's blood dripped at his home. The limo driver, who took OJ to the airport that night for his alibi, said OJ seemed hot and nervous and guarded a backpack that was later missing. Why did it vanish in two days unless he threw it out at the airport? That explains why no murder weapon or bloody clothes were ever found. Also, his footprints, in a very rare size 12 Bruno Magli shoes, were also at the crime scene. The shoes vanished after the crime as well. He also had a bad cut on his left hand two days after the murders, but said he didn't know how he cut it, and then changed it to he cut it on his cellphone. It was a very deep cut and his cellphone had smooth edges. His blood at the scene was also to the left of his shoe prints, perfectly consistent with his left hand bleeding at the scene. Verdict: NOT guilty. That's the US jury system, where rhetoric can beat facts at times, just as in politics.Best book on the OJ trial? "Outrage" by the late Vincent Bugliosi, the author of "Helter Skelter."Alternate video title suggested by a viewer: "F. Lee Bailey creates SMOKE SCREENS"