November 18, 2024

Gold Down on Geopolitical Risk Drop

Gold drops as perceived geopolitical risk declines

Gold declined -4.5% to US$2,566/oz, losing nearly US$200/oz from its peak, partly on a rising US$ and yields after Trump’s election win, but also from a perceived decline in geopolitical risk given the president’s record on international conflict.

Crypto stealing some of gold’s thunder

Crypto has surged since Trump’s win, and the launch of major ETFs for the sector this year has likely stolen some of gold’s thunder, given that it is also an ‘unprintable’ asset, with the IBIT Bitcoin ETF value surging to near 60% of the GLD gold ETF.

Gold stocks drop on metal plunge and equities slide

Gold stocks dropped on the slumping metal price and slide in equities, with the GDX losing -9.0% and GDXJ declining -8.9%, underperforming the -2.3% fall in the S&P 500, -3.5% tumble in the Nasdaq and -4.7% descent in the Russell 2000.

Gold stocks drop on metal plunge and equities slide

Figure 4

Figure 1

Gold Down on Geopolitical Risk Drop

The gold price slumped -1.9% to US$2,566/oz, and is down about US$200/oz from its peak two weeks ago. While this was partly driven by a continued rise in the US$ and yields, it also appears to be from a perceived decline in geopolitical risk since Trump’s win, given a track record of low international conflict in the president’s previous term. Equities also tumbled as a post-Trump-win bounce faded, and current realities of high valuations and persistent inflation seemed more in focus than hopes for eventual economic improvement under the new president. The S&P fell -2.3%, the Nasdaq -3.5% and Russell 2000 -4.7%, and the metal price and equities slump dragged down gold stocks, with the GDX down -9.0% and GDXJ by -8.9%.

This has sent the year to date performance for gold stocks again below tech, which is again a top performer for 2024 with a 30.1% rise, although the GDXJ and GDX are still up a decent 21.2% and 16.2%, respectively (Figure 4). Tech has had a closer race with utilities, which is up 24.8% this year, with the battle between these sectors representing the split in sentiment for the market between aggressive positioning and risk aversion, which is a shift from a 2023 that saw less concern over hedging.

The rise in safe haven gold and gold stocks is another sign of a more defensive posture by markets this year, and we expect that the gold rally is far from over. This week could actually be considered a healthy pullback from a particularly aggressive ramp up in recent months, which sent gold’s ratio versus some key commodities considerably above historical averages and indicated some frothiness. However, we expect that the main underlying driver for gold, monetary expansion, will run into 2025, as major central banks continue the rate cutting cycle started this year.

Gold Down on Geopolitical Risk Drop

Roughly estimating the gold price’s geopolitical risk premium

We can attempt a rough quantification of just how much of a premium was in the gold price for geopolitical risk by looking at the metal’s gains after the start of the two most major conflicts of the past three years. The price rose US$255/oz after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and by US$178/oz after the escalation of conflict in the Middle East in October 2023, for a combined US$433/oz (Figures 5, 6). With neither of these conflicts easing since, we can reasonably expect that these premiums had remained in the price until before the US election.

However, there have already been nascent signs of an improved willingness for the parties in these conflicts to negotiate since Trump was elected. If we assume that much of the nearly US$200/oz drop in gold was from the potential for deescalating these tensions, we could assume roughly another US$200/oz or more is still priced in from these conflicts. However, if we also factor in the rising US$ and yields into the drop, the geopolitical risk premium could still be towards the US$300/oz level. Therefore if we see further signs of the new Trump government making progress on cooling conflict in these regions, it could drive another pullback in gold.

Roughly estimating the gold price’s geopolitical risk premium

Crypto market size continues to catch up with gold

Another factor that could be moving against the gold price in recent weeks is a major rise in crypto, which can be considered a substitute for the metal for investors looking for an instrument that cannot be devalued by the creation of new supply. For crypto, the supply of most major coins is fixed and cannot be expanded and for gold new supply is from mine production which only grows about 2.0% per year. This contrasts with government issued currency, which can see dramatic expansions, including following the financial crisis of 2008-2009 and after the recent global health crisis.

While crypto is sometimes compared to gold as a store of value, it is conversely also often considered a risk asset, considering its correlation with the Nasdaq in some periods. However, for the past five years, crypto has significantly outperformed both, rising 781% versus a 159% gain in the Nasdaq and 94% rise in the gold price (Figure 7). Crypto has also proved far more volatile than either of these over the period, reaching as high at a 1,496% gain in mid-2021 and then collapsing back to an 189% gain as of early 2023 before once again recovering.

Crypto market size continues to catch up with gold

Overall with these wild swings, crypto cannot necessarily be considered a good store of value over the short to medium term, although over the long-term it certainly has had a massive increase and continues to return to new highs. While gold does have its own issues with short-term volatility, it does not face the huge moves that crypto does, and obviously has a far longer history as a store of value over 3,000 years.

We expect crypto and gold are likely to remain complements as much as competitors. Crypto still has issues including lost keys to wallets and any shutdown of networks or limited electricity availability, which will obviously not be a concern for gold. Crypto is also not yet used by any central banks as a key reserve asset, in contrast to gold, which comprises a substantial proportion of the monetary holdings of most major countries. Neither is widely accepted as a form of payment, although this is more likely to eventually change for crypto than gold. The standout common strength between them remains that their value cannot be printed away as with fiat currency.

So with crypto likely to provide a different, but equally useful economic function as gold, the size of the market has continued to catch up with the metal. One example of this is the ratio of the crypto market cap to the value of the above ground gold stock, which has increased to 18.5% in 2024, it highest ever (Figure 8). This ratio had remained quite steady at just over 2.0% from 2017 to 2020, and then entered a more volatile period, surging to 14.5% in 2021, reverting to 6.6% as crypto crashed given major issues with some key exchanges, and then starting to recover to 12.1% in 2023. At the current rate of expansion the crypto market cap could get to half the value of the gold stock over the next decade. The crypto market is even becoming sizeable compared to huge equity markets, with the crypto versus NYSE market cap rising from just 0.8% in 2019 to 11.1% in 2024 (Figure 9).

Figure 1

Figure 2

While some major crypto ETFs launched only this year, including the IBIT Bitcoin ETF, they have already reached a size within the range of many long-established metals ETFs. The IBIT ETF has assets under management (AUM) of US$41.5bn, which puts it not that far behind the largest gold ETF, GLD, with AUM of US$71.9bn, and it is now about a quarter of the value of the CPER copper ETF at US$166.0bn (Figure 10). The ETF of the second largest cryptocurrency, Ethereum, with US$4.8bn in AUM, is already about a third the size of SLV, the silver ETF.

Figure 3

Figure 11 shows just how rapidly the growth of the IBIT ETF versus the GLD ETF has been, starting the year with the former at just US$2.7bn in AUM, for a spread of over US$50bn, which has declined to only about US$30bn currently. The move has been boosted by the rarity and novelty of the cryptocurrency ETFs and the offer of a simpler way for the wider market to invest without the more involved learning curve including setting up wallets, which may have previously dissuaded some investors.

This could divert some of the inflows that would have otherwise gone into gold ETFs for investors looking for protection against devalued fiat currencies long-term, that are content to ride the short-term severe swings of crypto. With the cryptocurrency ETFs in their relative infancy, we expect that they could continue to see strong inflows into 2025, and at the current expansion rate the IBIT Bitcoin ETF AUM could even surpass those of the GLD gold ETF over the next year.

However, we would hardly count out a continued popularity of gold ETFs for 2025, and again note that crypto spikes like the one so far this year have historically been followed by severe crashes, with often several years before new highs are reached. If this shifts the market’s focus for cryptocurrency more towards its risk asset characteristics than its store of value function, a long-term proven safe-haven like gold, and its investment instruments, could still benefit.

Figure 4

Figure 1

Major declines for most large producers and TSXV gold

Most of the large producers and TSXV gold saw significant declines on the drop in gold and equities (Figures 12, 13). For the TSXV gold companies operating domestically, Snowline reported drill results from the Valley deposit and chip samples from Cynthia, Osisko Development closed a private placement and announced Q3/24 results, Mayfair Gold reported Q3/24 results and Amex released a PEA for Perron (Figure 14). For the TSXV gold companies operating internationally, Amaroq announced agreements with Auramet and Metalor for gold offtake and processing from Nalunaq, Thor Explorations reported Q3/24 results, Lion One announced a new zone at Tuvatu and Chesapeake provided an update on legal proceedings regarding Mexico’s cancellation of its San Vincente 3 concession, part of Metates (Figure 15).

Major declines for most large producers and TSXV gold

Figure 3

Disclaimer: This report is for informational use only and should not be used an alternative to the financial and legal advice of a qualified professional in business planning and investment. We do not represent that forecasts in this report will lead to a specific outcome or result, and are not liable in the event of any business action taken in whole or in part as a result of the contents of this report.

Share to Youtube Share to Facebook Facebook Share to Linkedin Share to Twitter Twitter Share to Tiktok